Parent to child transmission of poverty only addresses very basic understanding about inter-generational poverty. In order to understand the positive and negative transmissions, we have to understand the basic concept of an household. There was a flawed definition existed for the term household. It was considered as a unit in nature. A unit where income is pooled and decisions are made for the benefit of all members.
However in reality, a household usually run using contracts or deals rather than clear cut decisions as it works in a company.most decisions are made by husband or the predominant actor where he/she think which is right for all other family members. Households also have a gender attached to it. Therefore, the new definition included much more specific understanding about household. It define households as separate, gendered spheres of economic responsibility, which intersect through a ‘conjugal contract’ which is fundamental in defining the terms of cooperation.
Studies about IGP in USA explains Five models: the economic resources model; the family structure model; the correlated disadvantages model; the welfare culture model and the social isolation model. These models talk about Parents’ access to material and social resources exist in the society in they are living in and their ability to deploy them in ways that promote well-being for all the family members especially for the child if we consider Parent to child transmission of poverty. Before that researchers were saying the if resources exist in a society, then people will try different ways to access it. However even after the resources were available, people were unable to access them due to different factors. The obstacles that blocked are unique in nature and varies with the culture and strata in which they are living in.
When talking about strata of living, there has been an interesting talk about nuclear families. It says that members living in nuclear families have higher per capita incomes than members living in joint families. However the total income earned by a joint family is much larger than nuclear family. The article says that members living in joint families are vulnerable to internal conflicts and income shocks and there will be uneven distribution of work and consumption which may be true. However in nuclear families the income shocks may be expected but if they hit by a shock, there will not be anybody to support them. In joint family, there will always be somebody to take care of it. The vulnerability often do not have importance when we think about actually facing these shocks.
Kindly spend 5 seconds to share this post